BestOfBid.com

Ok, No bid Contracts.?

Ok, No bid Contracts. We accuse Chaney of giving Halliburton, one of only a handful of companies in the world that could do the job, no bid construction contracts in Iraq. How is that any different than Obama, the guy who now controls GM, giving GM a no bid contract to provide all the vehicles for the government?

Public Comments

  1. What you are going to find is that those contracts for Fords will be cancelled and they will be awarded to the Government Motors. Just watch. This is socialism in progress. It will also serve to break Ford into taking government money so they can take them over, too.
  2. Because the government now owns GM. Why can't they build their own vehicles if they want to? If someone doesn't start buying GM soon, thousands more will be laid off.
  3. Is Obama a private stockholder in GM??? LIKE CHENEY Was...?? I don't think so ...... Was Obama a former CEO for GM like Cheney was for halliburton??? NOW see the difference.....
  4. If you cannot see the difference, than I seriously doubt that you would understand a full explanation. You cannot even see the difference between Obama and the U.S. government?
  5. Don't you love the new look of socialism !
  6. Many military contracts awarded on the low=bid basis end up have huge cost overruns so what is the difference ?
  7. Got some kind of link where it says the fleet will only be GMs?
  8. This happened with the government bailout of Chrysler as well. All the Army and GSA cars were K-cars after the loan. Nothing new - no conspiracy.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers